XXXXX XXXX the ASB Area Manager lies during a telephone conversation with the defendant. Defendant questioned XXXX about the “custodial sentence” which they are seeking. Subsequently XXXXX XXXXX denies this and conveniently – THA are unable to find the recording of the telephone conversation.
The proposition is that playing an acoustic guitar for up to 7 minutes around midday is anti social behaviour and that I do it to cause a nuisance.
This is supported by the lies of the neighbours who invent an incident where they claim that I sung the song whilst standing before them and that I sung the Perjury song in order to intimidate them and that I did this by inserting their names into the song.
The neighbour from No.1 also includes an allegation of dangerous driving against me.
No.9 exaggerates earlier allegations made in her witness statement but no one notices the amplification.
Luckily the Judge is not swayed by claims that acoustic guitar playing can be anti social behaviour. Orders the ASB Case Officer to go away and seek clarification.
Without checking with defendant, the ASB Case Officer asserts that defendant recorded an acoustic guitar and then played it back amplified, which would be considered a nuisance.
The judge is not impressed by the ASB Case Officer’s “evidence”. No eviction, no imprisonment. However, the judge did find me guilty of breaching the injunction - by my own admission, because I wrote the Perjury song and that I went around singing it. He said that he made his decision based on "the fact" that "normal people do not go around singing".